Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 315%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics280% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 03:30
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$479
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 194
2-Core 381
120% 224 Pts
4-Core 729
8-Core 1,224
119% 977 Pts
64-Core 1,754
108% 1,754 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24G Graphics Card
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
280% Outstanding
Lighting 384
Reflection 457
Parallax 794
313% 545 fps
MRender 522
Gravity 275
Splatting 463
346% 420 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 280%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3003 2545 1639 1626 1635 1626 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 3,054
Mixed 2,925
SusWrite 2,012
599% 2,652 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 86.5
307% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,198
DQ Mixed 1,295
970% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 380%
Great: 477%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
115GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 489 489 489 490 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 484
Mixed 414
SusWrite 489
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.2
195% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 369
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB
58GB free
Firmware: MAT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 197 195 132 170 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 491
Mixed 316
SusWrite 206
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.7
200% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 332
262% 363 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
403GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3006 3006 3005 2570 1228 1225 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,622
Write 3,028
Mixed 2,851
SusWrite 2340
612% 2,711 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 81.9
270% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,477
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,377
1,029% 1,371 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 392%
Great: 477%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 119 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 109
Write 71.2
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 118
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 83.1
MC Write 72.4
MC Mixed 82.7
227% 79.4 GB/s
SC Read 66.5
SC Write 73
SC Mixed 68.3
198% 69.3 GB/s
Latency 44.6
90% 44.6 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 170 26.9" 2560 1417 GBT270D M27Q
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback