Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 219%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 394%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory477.3 GB free of 512 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231220
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 19:22
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 32-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 69.7
1-Core 202
2-Core 395
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,391
128% 1,071 Pts
64-Core 6,866
425% 6,866 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
Nvidia(10DE 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 306
Parallax 332
253% 316 fps
MRender 339
Gravity 282
Splatting 196
215% 273 fps
Poor: 174%
This bench: 212%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1406 1397 1415 1429 1416 1406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,758
Write 3,264
Mixed 2,958
SusWrite 1,411
586% 2598 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 89.2
285% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,490
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,242
942% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 343%
Great: 508%
HPT DISK 0_0 32TB
26TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4612 4613 4593 4617 4684 4760 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 88.1
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 100
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
7.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 151 151 152 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 150
Write 101
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 150
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86%
Great: 96%
HPT DISK 0_0 70TB
65TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 528 647 672 619 603 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC40F2046S1RC56BD1 MMCC 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
384% Outstanding
MC Read 116
MC Write 197
MC Mixed 158
448% 157 GB/s
SC Read 42
SC Write 76.9
SC Mixed 56.1
167% 58.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 57.3" 1280 720 SAM7476 Odyssey G95NC
Typical Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 393%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 613%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,665
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback