HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory14.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120815
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 01:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 189
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 444
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000
HP(103C 176B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.4
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 8.67
Splatting 13.6
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
109GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 506
Write 409
Mixed 415
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 40
122% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 87.4
72% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 134GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 491
Mixed 489
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 37
104% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 93.6
88% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF186D.M16 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BF186D.M16 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback