Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1605XA_M1605XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1605XA_M1605XA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1605XA
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 11:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940H
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 342
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1369
122% 1,029 Pts
64-Core 1,649
102% 1,649 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 1A13) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 84.3
48% 55.1 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 67
Splatting 95
55% 62.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1956 1769 1937 1628 1434 1436 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 2107
Mixed 1,373
SusWrite 1,694
369% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 61.4
218% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1110
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 1,070
712% 868 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 258%
Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 42.6
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 41
SC Write 60
SC Mixed 49.7
144% 50.2 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 129%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 22% 27 206 39 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0BEE
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1605XA_M1605XA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1605XA_M1605XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback