Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '24 at 15:42
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$188 1,442 User benchmarks, average bench 106% AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 76.9 1-Core 160 2-Core 321 98% 186 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 984 96% 787 Pts	64-Core 1207 75% 1207 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 118%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 220 Reflection 204 Parallax 196 179% 207 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 148 Splatting 131 125% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 158%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 774GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 483 Write 475 Mixed 434 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 54.4 174% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 366 272% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 151 Write 149 Mixed 70.1 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 116% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 115GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 128 Write 52.1 Mixed 50.4 83% 77 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.3 147% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB 1,382 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	MC Read 59.4 MC Write 64 MC Mixed 60.7 175% 61.4 GB/s	SC Read 48.9 SC Write 58.8 SC Mixed 54.2 154% 54 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 220%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	24"	1920 1080	BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 272%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 274%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $355Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	168x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $250Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	59x
Ryzen 5 7600XAMD $195Bench 110%, 6,311 samples	59x

GPU
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $660Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	51x
RTX 4070Nvidia $539Bench 190%, 45,585 samples	38x
RX 7900-XTXAMD $1,000Bench 257%, 5,548 samples	27x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	26x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	18x
Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $85Bench 437%, 23,469 samples	17x

RAM
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	25x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples	21x
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,121

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16