Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E30e

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Crawler E30e  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPxxRNA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 16:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 183
2-Core 354
106% 204 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 945
101% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A554) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2364 2597 2706 2305 2696 966 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 1072
Write 2,728
Mixed 1,432
SusWrite 2,272
429% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 302
4K Mixed 97.3
377% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 1,689
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 1,468
1,088% 1,449 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 361%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 15.5" 1536 801 BOE0B07
Typical Crawler E30e Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Crawler E30e

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback