Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BAB
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 10:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 166
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 637
57% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BAB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 11
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
533GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 1057 885 852 1137 924 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1583
Write 1,147
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 1,010
282% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 423
288% 362 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 179%
Great: 414%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 46.1
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0B81
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback