Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results


Gaming 155% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 210% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory	170.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220426
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration	422 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 15 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 2 CPU, 48 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 794 71% 597 Pts	64-Core 2,728 169% 2,728 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% MSI(1462 3881) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	216% Outstanding	Lighting 324 Reflection 298 Parallax 334 264% 319 fps	MRender 347 Gravity 255 Splatting 187 207% 263 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1547 1338 1347 1358 1332 1338 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,266 Write 2,232 Mixed 1,741 SusWrite 1,376 428% 1,904 MB/s	4K Read 64.4 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 86.8 306% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,280 DQ Write 952 DQ Mixed 1,121 836% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 410%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 102GB free Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,529 Write 1,909 Mixed 1,678 383% 1705 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 77.2 259% 93.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,377 DQ Write 1,085 DQ Mixed 1,220 916% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 315% 789GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2125 2116 1561 1523 1560 1559 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	347% Outstanding	Read 2,271 Write 2,160 Mixed 1,776 SusWrite 1,741 447% 1,987 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 84.9 287% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,537 DQ Write 1,196 DQ Mixed 1,345 1,012% 1,359 MB/s
Poor: 210% ↑ This bench: 347% Great: 392%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 95GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 48 3.5 18 77 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 432 Write 334 Mixed 182 SusWrite 57.6 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 6 52% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 71.3 DQ Mixed 25.9 38% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 58%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 87GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 467 419 332 334 334 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 470 Mixed 426 SusWrite 392 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 94.6 4K Mixed 54.4 182% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 354 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 112GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,299 Write 2,231 Mixed 1,736 465% 2,089 MB/s	4K Read 63.9 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 89 309% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,377 DQ Write 1,017 DQ Mixed 1,205 898% 1,200 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Seagate ST8000NE0011-1YG112 8TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 151 152 153 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 141%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 133GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 130 129 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 6x31.8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 6 of 12 slots used 191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 55.6 MC Write 45.2 MC Mixed 42.3 136% 47.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.5 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 165%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	26	5	120	34.1"	1280 720	ACR054F Acer X34 P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 157%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 213%

UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

CPU
CPU: Intel 0000%@1stBench 76%, 50 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R1stBench 70%, 89 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples	10x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	11x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $112Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	19x
AN1500 2TBWd_blackBench 325%, 313 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 77%, 188 samples	9x
18ASF2G72PDZ-2G9J3 8x16GBMicronBench 100%, 7 samples	6x
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 6x31.8GBSamsungBench 123%, 52 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $1,247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406