Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 00:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$129
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 313
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 947
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 87CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 176
Parallax 164
148% 174 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1223B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 100 116 124 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,731
Write 1,056
Mixed 273
SusWrite 108
173% 792 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 4.9
77% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 108
166% 338 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 33.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 34.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 19% 53 213 55 240 27" 1280 720 WAM2700 VZX240H-BL01
Typical GA-A520M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback