Dell XPS 15 9530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 15 9530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C59PM
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 29 '24 at 01:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 22.6
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 122
35% 68 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 291
33% 257 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0BEB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 29.7
18% 27.1 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 23.7
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG80ZNV512G KIOXIA 512GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,563
Write 3,134
Mixed 1,831
492% 2,176 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 405
304% 407 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 60 15.6" 1280 720 SHP1515
Typical XPS 15 9530 Builds (Compare 1,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 15 9530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback