Asus K53SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus K53SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SJ
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '18 at 08:41
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 347
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 1682) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9065
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 503
Write 345
Mixed 352
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 14.7
65% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 63.7
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SJ Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback