Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics347% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory178.4 GB free of 192 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 14:46
Run Duration513 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 71.7
1-Core 208
2-Core 406
117% 229 Pts
4-Core 754
8-Core 1,498
133% 1,126 Pts
64-Core 5,190
321% 5,190 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
347% Outstanding
Lighting 529
Reflection 566
Parallax 792
431% 629 fps
MRender 525
Gravity 564
Splatting 302
363% 464 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 347%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,586
Write 1,623
Mixed 2829
523% 2,346 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 64.8
169% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,922
DQ Write 1,433
DQ Mixed 1,746
1,287% 1,700 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 622%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 380
Write 491
Mixed 353
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 25.9
143% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,844
Write 3,844
Mixed 1,313
595% 2,667 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 55.2
211% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2,007
DQ Write 1,644
DQ Mixed 1,749
1,330% 1,800 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 622%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,166
Write 3,199
Mixed 1,272
495% 2,213 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 60.2
173% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 1,408
1,025% 1,346 MB/s
Poor: 169% Great: 567%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 933
Write 2,529
Mixed 2,342
441% 1,934 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 64.9
193% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 1,658
DQ Write 1095
DQ Mixed 1,461
1,067% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 169% Great: 567%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 385
Mixed 443
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 58.3
131% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,980
Write 1,959
Mixed 2,681
564% 2,540 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 62.5
200% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,953
DQ Write 1597
DQ Mixed 1,725
1,305% 1,758 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 622%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
871GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,663
Write 1,198
Mixed 1,857
351% 1,573 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 62.6
154% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,676
DQ Write 1,238
DQ Mixed 1,427
1,075% 1,447 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
929GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,075
Write 2,399
Mixed 852
395% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 27.6
172% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,660
DQ Write 1,322
DQ Mixed 1,459
1,101% 1,480 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 108
Mixed 65.5
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 245
Write 226
Mixed 122
146% 198 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.7
457% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 8.1
77% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965788-062.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
278% Outstanding
MC Read 193
MC Write 63
MC Mixed 80
320% 112 GB/s
SC Read 37.3
SC Write 64
SC Mixed 42.9
137% 48.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 278%
This bench: 278%
Great: 303%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 5% 43 218 60 240 48.7" 1280 720 SAM71AC LS49AG95
Typical Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 317%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 489%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback