Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LHB
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 05:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 48.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 191
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 401
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 170D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 975 549 65 158 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,025
Write 873
Mixed 758
SusWrite 436
173% 773 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 44.9
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 262
284% 473 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 141%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback