Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_M1605YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_M1605YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1605YA
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 10:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 302
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 767
86% 675 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 29DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 27.4
16% 21.7 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 20.3
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 1215 1226 1226 896 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 1,232
Mixed 1,137
SusWrite 986
274% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 83.9
283% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 823
659% 924 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 253%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 60 16" 1536 889 CMN1618
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_M1605YA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_M1605YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback