PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus WS C422 PRO_SE (all builds) |
Memory | 120.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '24 at 21:03 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon W-2295A
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
75.8%
Very good
|
80% 148 Pts
|
78% 656 Pts
|
150% 2,424 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.8%
Very good
|
79% 93 fps
|
70% 87.2 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMAA4GR7CJR8N-XN 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
115%
Outstanding
|
134% 47 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 60 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | GSM778E LG QHD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon W-2275IntelBench 86%, 89 samples | 20x |
Xeon W-2145IntelBench 86%, 1,207 samples | 8x |
Xeon W-2255IntelBench 87%, 289 samples | 6x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 12x |
RTX A5000NvidiaBench 166%, 809 samples | 9x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 134% - Outstanding | Total price: $106 |