Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 04:13
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$334
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 210
2-Core 415
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 813
8-Core 1,617
143% 1,215 Pts
64-Core 2,821
175% 2,821 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$470
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 232
Parallax 155
143% 187 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 148
Splatting 132
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 130%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,925
Write 1,595
Mixed 1,259
354% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 38.1
176% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 49.3
82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
460GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 496 496 497 497 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 497
Mixed 417
SusWrite 495
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 52.1
192% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 127%
Great: 121%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
0GB free
Firmware: V8X01c62
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 137
Write 280
Mixed 179
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 34.9
136% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 182
138% 181 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3758 3792 3792 3798 3804 3814 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
501% Outstanding
Read 2,139
Write 3,644
Mixed 2,544
SusWrite 3793
690% 3,030 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 275
4K Mixed 90.3
335% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,976
DQ Write 1,691
DQ Mixed 1893
1,402% 1,853 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 501%
Great: 501%
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3605 3649 3651 3657 3656 3669 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
490% Outstanding
Read 2123
Write 3,454
Mixed 2,481
SusWrite 3,648
666% 2,926 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 86.7
327% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 2,024
DQ Write 1,698
DQ Mixed 1,818
1,374% 1,847 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 490%
Great: 501%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
172GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 134 135 132 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 134
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
158% Outstanding
MC Read 64.6
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 54.7
163% 56.9 GB/s
SC Read 52
SC Write 56.9
SC Mixed 53.3
154% 54.1 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 158%
Great: 263%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 6% 17 218 60 120 23.8" 1280 720 MSI3BA4 MSI G241
History: Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B | Score 31: 0P 5R 2G 0B | Score 52: 0P 5R 9G 0B
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 272%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback