Yandex xeon-platinum-8358

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemYandex xeon-platinum-8358  (all builds)
MotherboardYandex xeon-platinum-8358
Memory29.9 GB free of 36 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 16:07
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon (Icelake)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.9% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 635
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-12Q
Nvidia(10DE 14DD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 322GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 138
Write 109
Mixed 110
SusWrite 74
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.9
877% 5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 114%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 18.5TB
12TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 47 44 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
Read 78
Write 52.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 45.4
46% 61 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
365% 2.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 36GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 99.2
MC Mixed 45.4
183% 64.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 8.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 29.7" 1920 1137 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical xeon-platinum-8358 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Yandex xeon-platinum-8358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback