Hansung TFG7597XG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHansung TFG7597XG  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM7ZG7P
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 08:23
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 40
42% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 85
38% 234 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Device(1D05 1111) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.48
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 9.7
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 9.8
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 817
Write 836
Mixed 683
174% 778 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 26.9
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 599
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 655
422% 498 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
579GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 513
Mixed 268
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 42
143% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 566
339% 358 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 31.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 26.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 403
10% 403 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 45 165 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0977
Typical TFG7597XG Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Hansung TFG7597XG

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback