Gigabyte GA-B650M K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 192%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive365% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M K  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 19:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 180
2-Core 327
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,012
100% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,327
82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 269
Parallax 285
232% 280 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 249
Splatting 195
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 200%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MLD M500 NVMe SSD 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3423 3453 2688 354 354 354 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 1,626
Write 3468
Mixed 2475
SusWrite 1771
532% 2,335 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 109
400% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 1,746
DQ Write 1,337
DQ Mixed 1,625
1,193% 1,569 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 365%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C32 2x16GB-$98
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 54.8
157% 54.9 GB/s
SC Read 49.6
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 55.9
150% 52.6 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 152%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 MSI4CB0 MSI G27CQ4 E2
Typical GA-B650M K Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback