HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BFB
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 21:25
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 72.3
1-Core 165
2-Core 329
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 926
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1065
66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8BFB) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 28.9
18% 21 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 22.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1990
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,592
397% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 46.2
162% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 637
468% 631 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 466%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
15GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 9
16% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
14% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 27" 1280 720 HPN4055 HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback