Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30GKS0H200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30GKS0H200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1060
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 349
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,263
116% 971 Pts
64-Core 1,948
120% 1,948 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Legend(17AA 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 45.7
39% 49.2 fps
MRender 52.5
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 48.3
39% 48.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BL7 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8L2QGXB7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2424 2522 2539 2574 2577 2584 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,632
Write 2,647
Mixed 2,462
SusWrite 2,537
580% 2,570 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 104
346% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,210
DQ Mixed 1,301
974% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 425%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU6CJR8N-XN 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 69.3
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 36.5
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 36.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 130%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM5AE2 LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback