Today's hottest deals

Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock A620M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620M-HDV/M.2
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime18 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$535
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 329
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,259
113% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,556
96% 1,556 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$375
Nvidia(10DE 16CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 198
Parallax 218
175% 210 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
153% 198 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI1T0GIMAI298 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1620 1609 1626 1672 1674 1671 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 1,864
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,225
SusWrite 1,645
358% 1,591 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 79.4
265% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,021
740% 946 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 298%
Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-4800 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 74.4
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 59.4
177% 62.1 GB/s
SC Read 59.3
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 53.9
152% 53.3 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 129%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical A620M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

System: Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $682
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback