Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 14:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 203
2-Core 411
118% 230 Pts
4-Core 809
8-Core 1,402
134% 1,105 Pts
64-Core 3,063
190% 3,063 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 176
Parallax 178
131% 172 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 149
Splatting 117
136% 174 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 126%
Great: 154%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1492 1491 1502 1514 1587 1597 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 4,613
Write 1,376
Mixed 734
SusWrite 1,530
450% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 19.5
172% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,494
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,271
951% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 383%
Great: 581%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback