Lenovo 83AA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2944 x 1840 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 92.8
41% 68 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 342
31% 262 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3C99) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.40.05.01
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.2% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 66.7
36% 45.6 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 69
42% 48.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HDJD-00BL2 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 957 827 968 782 864 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1761
Write 788
Mixed 1,057
SusWrite 957
254% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 30.6
106% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 440
309% 385 MB/s
Poor: 241%
This bench: 177%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 53.9
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 20.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 107%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 14.5" 1280 720 LEN8AAE
Typical 83AA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 83AA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback