Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA DESKTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140519
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 193
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 352
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7E44) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 52 60 58 31 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 458
Write 159
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 62.3
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 20.3
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 69.9
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 19.4
32% 62 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
855GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 152 160 159 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 160
Mixed 118
SusWrite 158
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 43 60 20" 1280 720 SAN2213 Casper
Typical NIRVANA DESKTOP Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback