HP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fa0xxxCND3470MS5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fa0xxxCND3470MS5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C69
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 66.1
1-Core 187
2-Core 367
106% 207 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 993
102% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
HP(103C 8C69) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 72.6
32% 46.6 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 73.3
44% 50.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 1489 1493 2586 2575 1767 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,154
Write 2,690
Mixed 2,085
SusWrite 1,900
499% 2,207 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 56.7
187% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 828
591% 776 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 294%
Great: 428%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 45.1
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 40.2
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 54.1
144% 50.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback