Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive626% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 213
2-Core 426
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 836
8-Core 1,454
138% 1,145 Pts
64-Core 2,504
155% 2,504 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 10.9
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 10.3
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4286 4194 4210 4166 4294 2794 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
626% Outstanding
Read 4,441
Write 4,649
Mixed 3,308
SusWrite 3,990
923% 4,097 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 288
4K Mixed 119
428% 163 MB/s
DQ Read 1,982
DQ Write 1,294
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,173% 1,604 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 626%
Great: 626%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$115
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 62.8
182% 63.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 29.9
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 162%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 32" 1280 720 DEL428C DELL G3223Q
Typical GA-B760M AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 339%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 373%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback