Today's hottest deals

DAC D7 ARN776-V8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDAC D7 ARN776-V8  (all builds)
MotherboardDAC DAC D7 ARN776-V8
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231106
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 276
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 715
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 812
50% 812 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8028) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 33.2
12% 23.9 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 22.2
16% 18.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280Q4L 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP800PN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2112 2187 2128 648 140 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
236% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 2,630
Mixed 1,589
SusWrite 1,223
405% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.4
186% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1015
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 842
602% 785 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 236%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SM5S520A8BEMC 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 25.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 16" 1707 996 CSO1609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback