MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$208
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 204
2-Core 403
118% 228 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 913
90% 733 Pts
64-Core 2,347
145% 2,347 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 121%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 40 37 33 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
248GB free
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 5.1 8 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 42%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
283GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD5EU016G-6400LA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 60.7
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 52.1
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 24.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 140%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 13 75 0" 1280 720
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 5,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback