Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 303%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 345%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics355% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 23:43
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$232
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 273
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 930
86% 718 Pts
64-Core 2,137
132% 2,137 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,735
Zotac(19DA 4675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
355% Outstanding
Lighting 560
Reflection 541
Parallax 684
456% 595 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 534
Splatting 282
343% 439 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 355%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 190 147 119 108 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,356
Write 816
Mixed 148
SusWrite 126
133% 611 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 29.4
98% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 176
138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 271%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
902GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 253 275 273 308 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61% Good
Read 430
Write 333
Mixed 332
SusWrite 275
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 17.6
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 102
97% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61%
Great: 494%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$272
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 237 282 282 318 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 362
Write 346
Mixed 335
SusWrite 279
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 17
62% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 68.8
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 50.2
49% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$192
288GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 281 303 302 341 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 398
Write 369
Mixed 352
SusWrite 304
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 27.3
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 99.4
82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$192
931GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 282 303 302 342 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 379
Write 375
Mixed 320
SusWrite 304
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 21.3
73% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.8
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 96.4
78% 109 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
136GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 103 94 100 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 112
Write 98.3
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 102
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 73.6
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 40.7
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 36.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 144 26.9" 1280 720 GBT2706 AORUS FI27Q
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback