Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 44 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 136 46% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 460 43% 356 Pts	64-Core 950 59% 950 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Gigabyte(1458 1546) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 2 9% 8.63 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 8.4 9% 11 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB 6,250 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7401Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1592 1570 1522 1420 1174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,245 Write 1,509 Mixed 1,341 SusWrite 1,443 314% 1,385 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 43.4 135% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 518 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 468 337% 438 MB/s
Poor: 166% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 433%
WD Green SN350 1TB 10,028 User benchmarks, average bench 262% 582GB free Firmware: 33006000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 1138 1283 1241 1160 1200 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,942 Write 11.7 Mixed 1,068 SusWrite 1,143 281% 1,291 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 8.4 64% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 12.5 79% 198 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 350%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 30.7 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	17	360	15.5"	1280 720	SHP153F LQ156M1JW30

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AORUS 5 SE Builds (Compare 629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 118%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	629x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	362x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	262x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	4x

SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	173x
ESR512GTLCW-E6GBTNB4 512GBBench 231%, 1,207 samples	84x
CA6-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 295%, 1,235 samples	72x

RAM
CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 92%, 2,995 samples	168x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	106x
CT8G4SFS832A.C8FP 2x8GBCrucialBench 85%, 682 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16