Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 198
2-Core 398
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 768
8-Core 1,430
131% 1,099 Pts
64-Core 2,552
158% 2,552 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.7
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 13
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-1T00-1014 1TB
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,233
Write 3,786
Mixed 2,886
808% 3,635 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 100
377% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,832
DQ Write 1,381
DQ Mixed 1,563
1,180% 1,592 MB/s
Poor: 329% Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 56.3
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 47.7
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 16" 1280 720 AUOCDAB
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback