Asus P452LJ

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Asus P452LJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P452LJ
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 59 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 91.9 41% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 132 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M 11,731 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 242A) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.61% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 8.6 6% 8.23 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 0.3 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 17 103 48 15 93 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 136 Write 86.5 Mixed 156 SusWrite 54.5 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 18.8 68% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 89.8 82% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 85%
Eyota-25 6GB 256GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 50GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 180 112 45 41 275 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 330 Write 322 Mixed 280 SusWrite 160 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 8.5 51% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 97.8 DQ Mixed 14.8 37% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.4% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	13.9"	1280 720	CMN1492

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P452LJ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus P452LJ

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	12x
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	5x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	3x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	18x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
XPG SX930 240GBAdata $80Bench 87%, 1,536 samples	1x

RAM
F3-1600C11-8GRSL Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GBUnknownBench 33%, 19 samples	3x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	3x
GR1600S3V64L11/8G Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 10GBUnknownBench 30%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16