QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 23xx (Gen 3 Class Opteron)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,301
115% 974 Pts
64-Core 1,865
115% 1,865 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 885B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 113
Parallax 72.3
72% 91.4 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 79.9
73% 90 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 462GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1252 766 531 499 470 477 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Red Hat VirtIO 999GB
350GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.1 4.5 11 328 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 326
Write 369
Mixed 301
SusWrite 74.2
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 0.3
20% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 91.9
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 41.6
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38.2
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 154%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 24.5" 1280 720 DELA1C0 DELL S2522HG
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback