Today's hottest deals

Alienware m16 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 286%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive395% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TR9W6
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 07:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 214
2-Core 419
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1,444
136% 1,127 Pts
64-Core 3,286
203% 3,286 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BFC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 290
Parallax 307
239% 296 fps
MRender 433
Gravity 251
Splatting 196
228% 293 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 208%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36309229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2122 2635 3220 1747 1410 1410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,671
Write 3,398
Mixed 2,854
SusWrite 2,091
622% 2,754 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 103
322% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,528
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1323
994% 1,335 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 395%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 51.7
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 25.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 15.9" 1280 720 CMN161E
Typical m16 R1 Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback