Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 20:18
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 294
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Zotac(19DA 7222) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.6
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MR1001 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 134 93 65 86 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 456
Write 394
Mixed 369
SusWrite 124
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 21.3
97% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 42.4
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 96%
MR1001 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 402 374 406 408 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 453
Write 413
Mixed 366
SusWrite 400
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 24.7
103% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 44.9
90% 177 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 96%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 183 181 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 170
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 178
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-059.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 9 60 30" 1280 720 DEL4016 DELL 3007WFP
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback