PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200704 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 26 '23 at 00:39 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2450 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
JASTER-240 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 2.1 2.5 3.6 76 3.3 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
87GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 102 104 104 104 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
41%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 6 | 162 | 2 | 75 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples | 228x |
Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples | 124x |
Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples | 61x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 32x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 30x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $107 |