Lenovo 21K7CTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21K7CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21K7CTO1WW
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 148
51% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 542
50% 418 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 50D9) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.40.05.08
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 30.7
16% 23.7 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 36.2
22% 26 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X162N 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2024
Write 1854
Mixed 1,690
414% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 51.7
168% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 731
557% 740 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 35.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 34.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback