Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507NV
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 14:37
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 155
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 512
45% 384 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 19DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.01.33
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 77
34% 55.8 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 44
Splatting 25.9
25% 31 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,244
Write 980
Mixed 984
238% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 25.6
110% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 433
280% 333 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 38.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $216Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback