Today's hottest deals

Inspur SA5112M5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemInspur SA5112M5  (all builds)
MotherboardInspur SA5112M5
Memory755 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration52 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6133
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 141
47% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 581
49% 421 Pts
64-Core 3,773
234% 3,773 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 24x32GB
24 of 24 slots used
767GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 32.7
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 18 64 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback