Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 02:32
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 177
53% 100 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 281
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 5.5
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 325 383 381 321 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 281
Write 270
Mixed 229
SusWrite 330
63% 277 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 30.5
105% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 216
183% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 111%
VendorC ProductCode 126GB
50GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 7.8 0.7 6 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Read 34.7
Write 1
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.6
10% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 27%
VendorC ProductCode 126GB
117GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 18 21 17 7.7 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 15.1
16% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
96% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 27" 1280 720 SPT0AD7 Sceptre F27
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback