Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20236

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20236  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 20:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 49
2-Core 73.4
46% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 199
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0A- 500GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 61 62 36 36 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 6.9
Write 36.8
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 47.1
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.1
71% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ED58F8W1600 RMT3170EB68F9W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 0.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD033A
Typical 20236 Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback