Lenovo 83EF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83EF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 325
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1008
102% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,447
90% 1,447 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3D0A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 211
Parallax 137
117% 164 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 114
Splatting 93.2
104% 133 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0L06A1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1235
Write 2,248
Mixed 112
268% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 24.7
150% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 515
404% 558 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 39.5
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 28.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 84.6" 1638 864 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical 83EF Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83EF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback