Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N200 125 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 200 68% 124 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 341 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 622 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Acer(1025 1655) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 7 Parallax 5.4 4% 5.7 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 5.3 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB 4,667 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: V5MA010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 606 741 798 528 536 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 961 Write 885 Mixed 879 SusWrite 684 192% 852 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 48.3 164% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 689 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 494 367% 497 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 307%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (95^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.2% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 29.5 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 20.9 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	47	11	0	14"	1280 720	BOE07F6

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 622 samples	12x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	2x

SSD
OM8PGP4128P-AA 128GBKingstonBench 97%, 78 samples	6x
OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GBKingstonBench 165%, 37 samples	4x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples	2x

RAM
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GBHynixBench 70%, 83 samples	10x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GBMicronBench 68%, 149 samples	3x
H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 4x1GBHynixBench 55%, 25 samples	1x