Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83BS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83BS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230308
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 143
51% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 452
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 381D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.57
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 27
Parallax 28.8
15% 24.7 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 27.7
17% 20.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 1002 954 921 972 975 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,196
Write 1,162
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 976
250% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 28.5
118% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 394
260% 316 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 156%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 31.4
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 16" 1536 889 LEN8986
Typical 83BS Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 83BS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback