Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory123.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 59
2-Core 165
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 484
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 105
Parallax 120
94% 113 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 91.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk Gen4x4 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11382
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 1428 1729 1825 1833 1807 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 1,640
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 1,593
369% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 23.1
92% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 46.1
71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 208%
Great: 544%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 37.6
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 2560 1369 AOC3202 Q32G2WG3
Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback