Today's hottest deals

MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory46.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180731
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 10:30
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$209
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 950
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,886
117% 1,886 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 402
Parallax 318
246% 341 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 245
Splatting 180
201% 257 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,424
Write 1,099
Mixed 568
227% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 36.4
143% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 517
458% 697 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
281GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 1199 1201 1197 1196 1189 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1,673
Mixed 767
SusWrite 1,227
308% 1,379 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.7
189% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 872
655% 878 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 247%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
248GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 473 475 477 478 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 479
Mixed 428
SusWrite 475
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 56.6
187% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$185
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 63 63 68 64 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 10
Write 87.1
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 73.1
32% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 33.4
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0609 Acer XZ321QU
Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback