Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory	16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220812
Uptime	58.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '23 at 04:00
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	PYF-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 170 58% 105 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 462 46% 378 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.6 0% 0.57 fps	MRender 0.6 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 18,245 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 419 329 278 153 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 1,286 Write 845 Mixed 764 SusWrite 341 180% 809 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 42.1 145% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 441 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 357 255% 333 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 297%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB 3,297 User benchmarks, average bench 249% 691GB free Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 790 829 856 866 894 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 991 Write 841 Mixed 866 SusWrite 835 199% 883 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 35.4 120% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 367 261% 340 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 354%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 1x31GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	47	35	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	373x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	56x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	201x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	194x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	34x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	200x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	65x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	55x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	179x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	121x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16