Alibaba Cloud ECS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive8.12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlibaba Cloud ECS  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 09:27
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8269CY
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 38.9
12% 28.2 Pts
4-Core 27.2
8-Core 29.3
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 31.2
2% 31.2 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 63 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.12% Terrible
Read 81
Write 59
Mixed 64
SusWrite 62.7
15% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
4% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
40GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 63 63 64 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 83.1
Write 46.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 63.2
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Alibaba Cloud 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.2
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 4 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Cloud ECS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alibaba Cloud ECS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback