Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive555% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory111 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 02:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 56.6
1-Core 220
2-Core 425
117% 234 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,486
141% 1,169 Pts
64-Core 3,147
195% 3,147 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 16
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.6 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4839 3744 3336 3422 3428 3468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
555% Outstanding
Read 4,760
Write 5,191
Mixed 2,905
SusWrite 3,706
931% 4,140 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 90.6
283% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,138
844% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 555%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 127GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback